Can you get mad at individuals for making use of the definition of ‘celesbian’ to explain clearly bisexual a-listers?

Can you get mad at individuals for making use of the definition of ‘celesbian’ to explain clearly bisexual a-listers?

The declare that Waverly is bi is dependant on one and just thing in past times she dated a . So according to this logic all women whom ever dated a is bisexual if you don’t right, even evidently Heather who included Waverly because of this right here. Oh, and another argument from people dissatisfied with Wav’s remark that is gay “there are so couple of bisexuals on TV”. Per GLAAD reports, bisexual ladies have actually nearly TWICE larger representation than lesbians (30% vs 17% among all LGBT figures).

I don’t have problem with that, assuming you would accept the show deciding otherwise if you wished Waverly to be bisexual. We have issue with lesbian erasure. The show didn’t make sure she’s bisexual, it really offered proof towards the contrary (Wav maybe perhaps perhaps not only said she’s homosexual, she indicated that she felt actually uneasy together with her AU fiancee, plus it wasn’t about Nicole since she didn’t have such issue with Rosita), yet this informative article ignores it and authoritatively states she’s bisexual. That’s borderline lesbophobic.

“It’s particularly infuriating considering how bisexual fandoms have actually long reputation for attacking people for declaring figures with no sexuality that is stated be homosexual. Sweet standards that are double.”

Continue reading “Can you get mad at individuals for making use of the definition of ‘celesbian’ to explain clearly bisexual a-listers?”